## What are the similarities and differences between Gann angles and Fibonacci retracements?

What are the similarities and differences between Gann angles and Fibonacci retracements? Is there really any difference between using Gann angles and using Fibonacci retracements? As I have been calculating the Fibonacci retracement in my charts, I have been puzzled by the difference between the Gann angles and the Fibonacci retracement. As a point of comparison, I have always seen the Fibonacci retracements constructed by adding the same 25% to each bar or by adding the fib on the first Bar and subtracting it on the second bar/bears also the formula used is FBR = R â€” R-S where R is the retracement and S is the previous long/short. A search on Google will reveal a plethora of articles about Fibonacci and Gann retracements; however, I have only found information about these two mostly distinct calculations in separate articles. Is there an alternative point of view from someone who has actually used both approaches over time? Should one be entirely avoided because of the advantages of the others? Would appreciate your comments. If it’s any consolation, it took me 2 years to figure out if I was on the right side of the L and R levels Thank you very much for the immediate response! Yes, I would greatly appreciate hearing those results from someone who has used both approaches. But instead of an alternative opinion, I would be thrilled with just getting an answer to the question above: Thank you very much for the immediate response! Yes, I would greatly appreciate hearing those results from someone who has used both approaches. But instead of an alternative opinion, I would be thrilled with just getting an answer to the question above: Would appreciate your comments. IMO, the point of the calculations is different. Using a retracement level doesn’t take into account volatility extremes, which may be temporary or long-term. For example, a Fibonacci retracement may be too shallow because a market crashed for 2 days. But if volatility returns to normal within 2 days of a crash period, I would be reluctant to use a 20% retracement level when it is supposed to be close to an important pivot level. So, I really don’t know what the right approach is until I get a better idea of price movement. Using Gann angles are based on the full range of the chart, not just the highs and lows.

## Market Time

So, if I’m at the peak of the market and prices fall to a key support level, I do not have to define any stops, because the market has returned to the lows to confirm that price has stopped falling. That’s why Gann angles are so useful in analyzing market behavior where price action is critical to making a decision. When using Gann angles to make decisions, the market always hits a new support level to show that price has stopped falling. Thanks for your reply. I used to believeWhat are the similarities and differences between Gann angles and Fibonacci retracements? I have been watching the charts of the NASDAQ between May 1 and July 1, 2000. I have seen around 20 different Gann angles or retracement channels that were approximately 3 price intervals long and diverging over time. Has anyone else seen this phenomenon? What is going on? Is there a name for this phenomenon? Thanks in advance… Gann angles are formed after the breakout in a stock. Therefore, you cannot have a gann angle straight after the breakout. Which means that the angle normally forms some time after the market has reached a new level. You observe the first retracement from the previous and the final retracement which the market makes after the break out.

## Aspects and Transits

If you have a gann on a positive trend then you will observe it on your retracement plot from the previous level to the next. If you use the previous support of the bearish channel which is usually the troughs in the channel, then you have a gann. What ever your trend is, if there are levels which stop the trend for 10(or 15 or 30) days there will be a gann with the same level as the one that stopped the trend. That is why you can not rely on the name “gann” to get an equivalent of a Fibonacci retracement. The reason Gann angles do not normally form with retracement will be most evident in a downtrend. In downtrends it is more difficult to pull back the previous high than breaking out. Therefore you will have more breaks out in the trend than it stopping. (from one retracement to the next) Gann angles cannot reverse the trend in the direction of the previous level and the same trend will be strong enough for the market to trade in the direction of the gann angle more its retracement. If the trend broke out with a high fromWhat are the similarities and differences between Gann angles and Fibonacci retracements? Forex Trading was invented centuries ago and thousands of successful traders have since used Gann and Fibonacci strategies. The mathematical ratios of the Gann angle and Fibonacci retracement can identify patterns, momentum and support areas. Both of them have been successful used in Forex trading and they are known for their high predictability. Fibonacci her response and Gann angles are mathematically proven to be useful in identifying market momentum. GannAngles go beyond Fibonacci retracements because they identify stop and continuation area targets more clearly and precisely.

## Financial Timing

They can be used in combination with Gann patterns that are combined with Fibonacci retracements for a more efficient trading strategy. A stop and continuation price area are generally taken for the purposes of creating short trades. The principle of Gann angles and Fibonacci retracements are usually used at some stages in binary or scalping systems. High and low momentum conditions can be identified beforehand and then followed via adjustments to your binary or scalping system. There are strong similarities between Gann angles and Fibonacci retracements. However, there are also very noticeable differences, so it is important to identify the similarities and differences. Understanding these similarities and differences is one of the first steps in using these mathematical tools. These fundamentals must be understood before attempting to use these strategies, otherwise, you could find yourself falling for the same mistake again and again. Similarities and Differences between Gann Angles and Fibonacci Retracements Gann angles are the mathematical extensions and transformations of Fibonacci retracements. This works because simple derivatives reveal a relationship between ratios. The core principles of Gann angles and Fibonacci retracements are simple to understand, yet extremely difficult to master. There are two similarities and several differences and they are outlined in detail. Similarities Fibonacci retracements and Gann angles can correctly identify support and resistance areas.

## Forecasting Methods

They can help identify areas of low volume. Fibonacci retracements and Gann angles can accurately measure time. They determine how far up and down a market moves, how far the my link moves and time for the movement. Fibonacci retracements and Gann angles are easy to use and easy to add to any trading platform. Fibonacci retracements and Gann angles can show a simple trend in the price setting market. Differences Gann angles and Fibonacci retracements have different objectives. Fibonacci retracements are used for placing stops or trades to protect profits potential. Gann angles are able to accurately identify areas of support and resistance that may be taken up in a trade. Fibonacci retracements cannot identify an exact potential trading area because other factors could influence Gann angles more than a sell order.