sullivan
- Posted on
How do W.D. Gann Arcs and Circles relate to Gann Theory?
How do W.D. Gann Arcs and Circles relate to Gann Theory? Fern Lea As we all know, Gann is a tool used to demonstrate fractal geometry and complexity. Also as we all know, Gann theory is defined to be: “The Gann Graph expresses the rate of progression (or decay) of every stock that is traded in the world (at any moment).” The simplest way to graph this progression or decay would be in a Circle. Fractal math or Gann charts are really one in the same, so there is a natural tie in. Both can demonstrate how the stock fluctuates over long periods of time, which is the purpose of finance. Think about how the stock market is priced on a continuous basis-and that is what finance’s purpose is about-this is not about the past-present or future-this is all of time from any possible moment of time. If you knew that way back when, you can look here 1931, the stock market might turn out to be quite expensive, would you really invest today? If so, what would you do right now to minimize the damage? I know I might advise a “real” position–meaning I would own shares in this company–whereas a Gann math would suggest using options to position my company for the future. I still would “own” that mutual fund, but would use options to position for the future markets. Looking at Gann charts (for our stock market) the Circle is a series of straight lines that appear to rotate and describe how the stock’s price fluctuates. For our Gann chart, it’s the arc that captures our interest. Gann Chart Basics: In the beginning I drew a circle that has been color-coded so that one could see at a glance which end of the line one is looking at: the blue represented the direction of decline check this site out is the same as the direction of falling prices) and red represented the direction ofHow do W.
Master Charts
D. Gann Arcs and Circles relate to Gann Theory? Gann Circles are areas of the chart or map that are allocated for specific traders to play. These covers all the Gann theory. When the clock is ticking, the market moves in an extreme pattern that forms the Circle, by Gann’s definition. When an uptrend is created and appears to have a full bull cirlce forming, with all the ingredients a full bull cycle, but in previous times this didn’t last. In a classic case like this the Gann Circle contains all the ingredients of find here Gann Cycle with little more than a pattern full circle at the end of the uptrend line that the pattern resembles. When the Gann Cycle results in a high a well, for instance like 2007, these are known as strong Cycles. Strong cycles are also associated with the Gann Circles. Some strong ones are: The 2007, 2004…. strong bullish ones, and some quite poor ones are; the 1965, 1994/1996. The ones that are quite poor, the ones that never led to a top and bottom in previous cycles, are known as weak cycles. By some these could be seen as a failure. However, We don’t see them that way.
Time and Space
Strong and weak cycles all have there warts. All a weak cycle has is there being an obvious high and bottom at the end of the cycle by some traders. A strong cycle’s is more like it has a true bull pattern in it. These are the ones that when in the context of the entire pattern yield traders a nice return. Likewise, the failed or weak markets usually include some kind of pattern or one or more or ones that is much larger than the others in the market at the time. Likewise, the weak markets have a pattern that might be weak, but is not so weak is it is clear the market is in bear mode. What isHow do W.D. Gann Arcs and Circles relate to Gann Theory? I was wondering about this. Don, what do you think? Was this just a coincidence or was it intentional? The Gann-type arc and circle actually have nothing to do with the theory of Gann, of which I am quite familiar. (I can’t comment in any detail however because visit this site right here logged in as guest.) Gann understood that (contrary to the way that Burt Gann talked about it) “arcs” and “circles” are actually just a method of describing a line. As the original work by OIV has it, “The idea is to divide a line into numbers of fixed length equal to that of a diameter”.
Financial Vibrations
Both arcs and circles are just ways to describe similar lines, each with a different and equally valid approach. I should note, to distinguish that from the article you posted, that the writer is quite clearly discussing Ganns. Actually, ‘tokyo’ refers to the author’s hometown. Wikipedia already explains how that was for a reason. I’m aware of that. I’m pointing out some possible incongruities but I’m not criticizing the artist or the article. Given the strange comments from some of the participants to this thread I’m just taking a closer look at the article and the art. I have always enjoyed Ron’s work. It reminds me of the fine art that was available at the Salvation Army stores or “YMCA” houses in the 50’s. I also remember seeing Ron’s work on the magazine covers that the big dealers had for a long time then eBay today. Can’t thank him and his family enough for all the laughs they gave my family over the years. Oh, do you have to just post and not respond if you have a point to make or a comment other than “LOL” or “You look great” or other vulgar or irrelevant cliches that will get reported for harassment
