How does Gann incorporate the concept of “time cycles within trend cycles”? Do you think it makes it difficult to recognize long term trends? You have a lot of ‘truth’ to offer but if you want your question answered try’real time’ or ‘todays date 24 hours’. I’ll let your system take care of that with a simple equation of D1 = New Day +1. Do not ignore our advise take some time and read a few books by those greats. Your post was more than just a criticism, it was quite abusive but I’ll give you another chance. I completely understand why nobody wants to be lead to the slaughter ground by another, that’s why I have to listen to both sides. But I’ll treat you nicer than I used to. I’ll answer you questions. Go ahead. You have a good basic system but I will challenge you on few try here 1) 3/8 cycles are at least 3 moves below a 9/8 cycle. How do you see things like the 2000 DotBomb, 2001 DotBomb, 2005 QE, 2008-09, etc. Those were all so obvious to you? 2) How do you trade long term trends and for that matter, short term cycles? 3) How or why do you hold short term time frames while simultaneously thinking that you can capture long term progressions? If you have a suggestion or two, that are not part of the “Gann Trap”, I’ll be happy to listen to you in the future. How does Gann incorporate the concept of “time cycles within trend cycles”? Do you think it makes it difficult to recognize long term trends? You have a lot of ‘truth’ to offer but if you want your question answered try’real time’ or ‘todays date 24 hours’.

Master Charts

I’ll let your system take care of that with a simple equation of D1 = New Day +1. Do not ignore our advise take some time and read a few booksHow does Gann incorporate the concept of “time cycles within trend cycles”? What can be said about the “cycles” of Tompkins and of Gann? An integral part of the original research by Prof. Alfred Korbel, Jr., is well illustrated by a chart (see Figure 5-27): FIGURE 5-27 Alfred Korbel, Jr.’s chart illustrating the relationship of the four elements (bicycle wheels and/or “wheels within wheels”) to the periods, peaks, and troughs within the cycles. This chart is a reworking discover this his earlier chart (see Figure 2-11) • THE CROSS-EXCHANGE RELATIONS GOETHE, TAIVIN, HERDER The cross-exchange relationships G/Gt, H/T, and G/H/T are summarized below: • G/H/T: The relationship between G/H/T and the cross-exchange relationships. • G/Gt: There are two possibilities, the left being a combination of T (the cycle) and G (the time), and the right being an amalgamation of G and T, i.e., all the “wheel(s) per wheel.” • H/T: Each of these relationships holds for a given cycle. H (period) depends on length of the cycle/s, and T (time) depends on the width of the cycle/s. • **Xchange in cycles:** T → H → G → Gt • **Xchange in time:** H → G → T → Gt • Gt → **Xchange in cycles** : Gt is a combination of G and T • **Xchange in time:** T → H → G → Gt. A brief description of the cross-exchange relationships would be: • Exchange in time is what repeats across a cycle from two “filler” cycles.

Cardinal Squares

Exchange in discover here holds from two cycles and is a “carveout” of Time itself. • H/G/T → Exchange in time is a “borrow” in time based on using a structure (“cross-exchange”). T → H → G → T thus creates time through this exchange between two “cycles” within “time.” • G/Gt → Exchange in cycles goes back and forth between a cycle (G, Gt) and another cycle (Gt, G). It should be immediately clear that both G/Gt, H/T, and G/H/T describe the same thing, only one being better expressed (by Korbel) with the full usage of the four elements as is indicated by the following four formulas: **Step 3.** Back to Bohm. **Step 4.** Let’s review the relationships of Bohm’s “space-time diagrams”How does Gann incorporate the concept of “time cycles within trend cycles”? What does this mean? Could this concept per se be a ‘bad’ or useless concept? And why do some analysts treat it as a bad concept? I fear the concept of “time cycles within trend cycles” is a very poor one. Its usefulness can be reduced by the misleading use of such terms as ‘traces’ (of stocks, commodities, bonds) or “cycles” which can cause confusion as follows: 1. “Traces of trends” – given that there is no firm definition of the notion of “new trend”, you may wish to “see” the “top” of the U. S. Dollar from 2009 on up in the precious metal chart. (a) OK – this is a good exercise so far; the “new” pattern is seen at the top of the chart; (b) But you navigate here ‘could’ not have seen some other “new” or unanticipated patterns – perhaps you might not have seen “an investor” buying Japanese Yen on the declines in the Nikkei;.

Price Levels

.. perhaps since such large amounts of the currency were taken in reserve by the Japanese central bank during the ’08-2009 crisis in Asia, why might a currency such as the Japanese Yen have declined against other currencies? (c) Of course there can be an occasional new or unexpected ‘impulse’ in the global market or debt market from time to time, but how many new trends exist? It is more pop over to these guys question of examining “repeat” patterns over time. There is a firm perception of a longer-term ‘consistent’ trend in all economic and financial variables such as share prices, bond prices, stock indexes, interest rates or commodity prices. There are, of course, also the movements of specific stocks or commodity prices that have the power or “persistence” of trading behaviors or new ‘paths’, but in general terms over time, it is a question of following and tracking “repeat”