How do W.D. Gann Arcs and Circles account for volatility in the market? Here’s part of a theory. To find a story about the market, you must turn to the weather. The worst market stories come this page winter and spring, perhaps linked to hailstones or spring flowers and butterflies. This week’s market story is about something that everyone knows about: The weather. It does not need to be the weather that everyone mentions. The story could be a good storm or something that happens to find here like losing control of your car. What will the story be about? Let us know in the comments. Weather effects market To understand how bad the market has been, start by describing how bad the weather has been for that winter and spring. Then tell a market-specific tail, or a theory about what will happen. Add one element at a time. First the weather, then thoughts about what the weather does to the market.

Cardinal Points

Which way the market takes depends on what you think about market stocks. Many investors have great faith in market forecasts, useful source the predictions have proved true in the past. But remember that weather and market cycles are always just one or a few months away from perfecting useful content of history’s perfect storms, a monster winter or spring. This week we will show you how an archer knows to pull back his arrows when it is about to rain, and how to catch raindrops on the tip of an arrow. After all, if you know that a storm is coming, you’d better bring your rain gear. Week of Feb. 26 Winter in the U.S. has been cold, rainy and snowy. Weather is one of the big picture story lines this week. Weather outside markets First let’s do forecasting for the winter. Let’s start in January. This is a picture of the extent of the cold wave from the NOAA.

Fixed Stars

It is an anomolyHow do W.D. Gann Arcs and Circles account for volatility in the market? I find it puzzling when someone suggests the market will be volatile and of course, I see no evidence for that. Is there evidence to suggest that markets will remain volatile beyond certain cycles as forecast by the classic Gann models? Or does that only apply to very long term and bull markets? At the same time, I may be missing a point of view. I’m a fan of classic math/scientific thinking here so am cautious of the trend, stock market. I find it puzzling when someone suggests the market will be volatile and of course, I see no evidence for that. Is there evidence to suggest that markets will remain volatile beyond certain cycles as forecast by the classic Gann models? Or does that only apply to very long term and bull markets? At the same time, I may be missing a point of view. I’m a fan of classic math/scientific thinking He gave the same answer to that question in earlier post, quoting “A scientist does not say that the market is not rational, but only that one is not forced to follow the trend during the measurement period.” During the crash of 2007-2008 many claimed about it as bottom, few claiming the market is overvalued and irrational, because index broke so many of its previous highest all time high. After that -2009, and onward, few still claimed about old top as bottom. I, myself, never said that market will be volatile-cycling or whatever.. I don’t make any such claims! And, I’ll continue to stand by A.

Harmonic Vibrations

Einstein saying, “Of all the beasts in the field of philosophy, the mathematicians are, to my mind, the most horrid”. So, no need to prove to another one here with your rhetoric. I find it puzzling when someone suggests the market will be volatile and of course, I see no evidence for that. Is there evidence to suggest that markets will remain volatile beyond certain cyclesHow do W.D. Gann Arcs and Circles account for volatility in the market? There are a couple of notions of volatility out there, most concerning time-series. Typically, we consider a number of price moves over a time-period and give it a numerical value based on the change in prices and the length of that change. Traditional volatility, as the term is used by chartists, is a very loose measure that usually ignores both directionality and timing. In what I consider to be the correct and popularly accepted approach in my niche market segment, it is the number of price moves with respect to the length of time between those moves that is considered to be the only variable we are actually measuring. In the W.D. Gann world, I consider something very close to volatility to be a linear “path”, not a set of price changes. We can “measure volatility” by looking at the number of paths with varying pips and lengths, but we don’t want just randomly generated paths in our analysis.

Harmonic Vibrations

We should strive to study W.D. Gann Arcs, not to place an arbitrary number of pips on them. We want graphs and results that can be thought-out (in the sense of how the energy market experiences periodic reversals of some kind in its price movements) which stand up to that kind of thinking. W.D. and F. L. Terman, in their influential work on the stock market between view website and 1992, found a method to visualize W.D. Gann-generated paths and made the (at least for me) revolutionary observation that looking at the number of arcs per second on the graph was something worth studying: This graphic here is from their article “Volatility as Dynamics of Alternating Patterns”. While Volatility as I explain it might not technically be the same thing as their Volatility as we know these days, they certainly pointed to something revolutionary. I use