How do W.D. Gann Arcs adapt to different market environments? Are they more resilient to a softer environment? The current market is generally relatively soft at the moment, unless you think price will drop and there will be no more sellers to sell, then I guess you are right, but I haven’t seen that yet. My W.D. Gann Arc are doing fine in that area, I have been pretty active in that area as well. Most of that may end up going into P.G. Gann is pretty resilient to that though. The P.G. Gann models are also not very strong as there are plenty of non-W.D.

Gann Diamond

Gann models out there that are good enough better anyway! 🙂 Originally posted by redskeptic Are you saying trading is more dangerous now? The market is doing very well for Arcs, but not at all his response for Ganns. That is why the Arcs are doing so well when the Ganns are doing less well. If I had have to choose between trying to make more money with Arcs or trying to try and make money with Ganns instead of Arcs, I would choose the Arcs. I guess that is like a computer programmer that must choose between C++ and Java. They would probably go with C++, before they must learn Java 🙂 No one is saying you can’t put in work and make money W.D., but it requires you to be smarter and wiser than most of us and obviously more disciplined as well. I have seen and heard of guys working 60 hours weeks on the Ganns and they never make a dime. Again, they have smart strategies with lots of brains and I can see them getting to it, but they end up burning through their resources and just plain get beat by the market. It’s even harder for them, because often they can’t afford to hold onto contracts because their resources are gone. You can do some good tradesHow do W.D. Gann Arcs adapt to different market environments? Quite well, really.

Gann Square

It’s incredible that they’ve managed to achieve such a diversity in performance when the deck was released. That said, any performance evaluation requires constant, systematic maintenance. That means the deck isn’t static. Sure, you can get creative with the deck. You can boost some cards, maybe even dump some bombs—but the deck as a whole is stuck with the cards and combo it always was. Or, in some cases, might as well be. Which brings us to my latest batch. This would be the third variant in the space of a year. The first two. Why are the last two so different? Simple. By the time these decks were developed, the archetype had changed dramatically. The deck’s evolution led it towards different strategies, from one to three big combos, and the last deck was an attempt at a variant on that last combo in particular. All in all, the overall combo became less valuable.

Time and Price Squaring

Fortunately, that doesn’t mean the deck is unplayable. It’s still viable, but the deck plays a lot differently. If you know what an opponent is doing, there are more and better ways to interact with their potential for either lethal or extra turns. The whole strategy is more aggressive and precise, as are the variants—specifically the third, that takes a lot of the deck’s value to boost and play bombs early. These changes are so huge, there’s more data to show for it. As a result, the deck only wins around 65% of Ranked games, compared to over 80% last time. This is a huge, huge drop, and it’s not uncommon. Anyway, read on if you want to see the deck. And hopefully you’ll come away surprised. Deck Build: G/W Dash (64/70) Deck Videos: G/How do W.D. Gann Arcs adapt to different market environments? On the last day of the PRA2019, Mark G. has figured out the formula.

Square of 52

.. On both the last day and first day of the 2018 PRA’s I had a talk with Eric Marlow, CEO of EnerSys, to map the changes in world markets over the years and gain a good understanding of the world of solar thermal and the different niche and niche market strategies. These markets were in transition as they took into account a shrinking uranium and diminishing nuclear market. The goal was to open up new markets like solar thermal and move away from selling all the products to all parties of the nuclear fuel cycle… At the 2014 PRA, Eric said “we see ourselves as the CPO of the nuclear fuel cycle and we are interested in nuclear technologies. We’re looking at everything from radioactivity to waste control management to energy recovery. We see nuclear as providing grid-abundant energy, decarbonization, carbon extraction, storage, and waste disposal. We want to be a part of that vision”. That vision did not include investing in all the technologies of the nuclear energy systems. How times have changed! Now we have a clear understanding of solutions to extend the lifetime and make the economics more favorable with solar thermal’s CHP.

Harmonic Analysis

What we are finding out is there is some important fundamental research to be done on new CHP technology. So we open up the second day of PRA with a talk to Dr. Joel E. Parker at UC Davis. He is recognized as one of the leading researchers in photodiodes and diode science and working in the area of high-efficiency solar photovoltaics. His talk was based on a recent publication in Science titled: “The Search for Ultra-High Efficiency Solar Cell Materials” (http://science.sciencemag.org/content/343/6170/1423) Jo has