Are Gann angles more effective in Check Out Your URL markets or timeframes? I assume its used for when a stock retraces to form a double bottom and retraces to form another double top, the high of the gap on the major backtest.. I cant explain really, just trying to understand the model in a more detailed way, but is it always good to use on a ‘backtest’ in order to call the retracement? or does it just work at certain strategies and times?….. My posts don’t add to the question, but explain they way I use this indicator Thanks in advance Comment deleted Wed Feb 07, 2010 4:33 am skinnerboy Joined: 19 Nov 2008 Posts: 65 well… I agree with you, but you may want to add a minor disclaimer to your posts after the first 2 lines Wed Feb 07, 2010 4:45 am Sudhir Joined: 11 Dec 2008 Posts: 53 The point my friend, is simply in the world of technical analysis (or any field of expertise), the art of the possible is near impossible to be able to estimate in advance. Once you understand how people react in certain markets and contexts, you will be able to better predict. No formula or indicator is 100% correct, no matter its use in a signal (at a time its used) Wed Feb 07, 2010 4:46 am JimWoods Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 2316 If I close or open long trades and/or my stops are closed at the gap, are my losses or gains Gann more likely related specifically to the move in the market into the gap? Can they be reduced to a specific position (i.

Market Geometry

e. if the bottom is a downtrend with it being deep, is a short position made better by closing at the bottom), and furthermore can they relate to timeframes, whether a gap that is 2,5,10 or 20 days long, rather than just the move in the market into the gap? Thank you Wed Feb 07, 2010 5:00 am Sudhir Joined: 11 Dec 2008 Posts: 53 The fact is in extreme cases (i.e all the best ones) technical analysis is more about personal experience that can’t be simplified in a set of rules, and that has nothing to do with the position your have(as it might be) or your stop loss, and/or your entry if you do check my source long position. It’s an issue of dealing with risk when trading (do you have enough?) and being familiar with the behaviour of a certain instrument in certain contexts (what happens if the market goes sideways and you have a short position, do you try to enter or exit? what about long- short ratio?) All the great technical analysts understand and predict that there is always a patternAre Gann angles more effective in certain markets or timeframes? As we’re all aware the recent market correction prompted quite a few negative trending strategies, not only Gann Angles, but the trend towards higher timeframe stops and lower timeframes moving averages as well. The main ones mentioned were 1) the long term trailing stop, 2) the L-inverse, 3) the lower time frame moving average stop, 4) the 10 week EMA and 5) the uptrend lines. My question check my source with all of these different methods being discussed on this forum, are the different approaches being justified? If not, is there a better method to catch a bear trend? Another related question is, when markets are red, which method do you feel is the most effective? Should we follow the trend or take action when the markets fall below sell triggers? Ideally, we would have a set of system definitions/rules/profit targets with a full set of rules and tests. The following could be used to determine when these tests are met: a) If a given rule is met;b) If all rules are met, place a sell stop at current support.c) If all simple rules are met, place a sell stop at recent support.d) If all short rules are met, place a sell stop at current support.e) If the long rules are met, place a browse around here stop at recent support.f) If the buy rules are met, find a long entry. In addition, I would set up real time tests that either pause when a rule is met or initiate said rule when the market falls enough down a trend line. After the system is set up, you would be long during uptrends.

Planetary Aspects

The only time you should sell is after a break down below recent support or the trend line. I.E. 10-EMA below zero and the momentum doesn’t hold. An extended move up usually follows a short sale. An additional set ofAre Gann angles more effective in certain markets or timeframes? In a previous post I briefly addressed the question if Gann angles only are useless and if signals play a role. A common, and apparently correct, answer is yes. In this post I wanted to address the second question. I did some research on this topic and found an excellent answer in a discussion on “stocks, options and the science of Gann angles” in The First Trade website. This is the response given by one of the members. Here is the first part: Thank you for your message, and thank you for the opportunity to expand upon the recent article “stocks, options and the science of Gann angles.” With that, can someone take my nursing homework engage. (More…) First of all, the response looks good, so I need to readjust this article further (it’s not finished yet of course).

Harmonic Analysis

The first question was about Gann angles exclusively. There seems investigate this site be a general opinion that only signals can be reliable. In that case what are all Gann angles doing then? The second question was about what they say. Specifically, signal on other exchanges than the US? A third question is about market gaps, which are usually considered to be more reliable than market entries and which some Gann traders believe to be more reliable than price gaps and the other Gann angles? Yes, there are probably other possibilities to find hidden opportunities with options and Gann angles other than in the N.D., so I consider it important to address these questions. Gann Angles? Something is Missing! There is only one exchange where Gann angles are used (the NYSE in the USA) and this is a major flaw in my analysis and research. I will address that before I continue analysing the effectiveness of Gann angles. For example, when someone uses the N.D. as the market